Re: [LAD] [ANN] LV2 beta3

On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 03:45 +0200, torbenh@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:44:54PM +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:58:25PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> >
> > > I don't support it unless someone has a representation issue. You're
> > > not like to see if (fs == 44100) anyway, and if you did you'd want to
> > > hedge a bit: if (fs > 44090 && fs < 44110). If you have to write if
> > > (fs_num / fs_denom == 44100) then things are bit dodgy anyway.
> >
> > Let me state once and for all, even it will not gain me any popularity:
> >
> > Anyone who thinks that writing a range check on a fraction A/B is too
> > difficult is very probably completely incompetent and should not waste
> > his/her time trying to write audio DSP code for a plugin.
>
> Anyone who refuses to write LV2 extensions has a bad taste.
> this is about aesthetics.
>
> we all love the sound, but look:
>
>
> void Ladspa_Moogvcf2::runproc (unsigned long len, bool add)
> {
[snip]
> you are IMO disqualified from aestetics discussions :)

.... uh oh.

Can we figure out this sample rate thing before this gets really
ugly? :)

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri May 11 08:15:02 2007