[LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?

From: joel silvestre <j.silvestre@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 04 2007 - 12:13:57 EEST

Following Andrew's question, are there any advantages in using 96 or
88.2KHz rather than 44.1KHz directly?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jun 4 16:15:02 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Steve Harris: "Re: [LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?"
Previous message: Denis Sbragion: "Re: [LAD] Casa del Suono"
Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: [LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?"
Maybe reply: Steve Harris: "Re: [LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?"
Maybe reply: Andrew Gaydenko: "Re: [LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST