Re: [LAD] 96, 88.2 or 44.1?

From: Steve Harris <steve@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 04 2007 - 12:28:42 EEST

On 4 Jun 2007, at 10:13, joel silvestre wrote:

> Following Andrew's question, are there any advantages in using 96 or
> 88.2KHz rather than 44.1KHz directly?

Probably. You get a bit more frequency headroom eg. in filters, and
if you're recording at 96 you might get a bit more high frequencies
that the antialiasing filter in your AD converter would chop of. I've
no idea how much difference it makes in practice though.

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jun 4 16:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 04 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST