On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 16:16 +0200, Mr.SpOOn wrote:
> > If it is specifically for Linux, LV2 might be (is) a better choice.
> > Any specific reasons you want to develop a VST ?
>
> Not really. I have to program something oriented to audio for the
> university. I can use any operative system and my first idea was to
> learn to create a vst-plugin. I know that there is the sdk in the
> Steinberg site, but then I thought I could try to create it in Linux
> (because I'd prefer so), so I asked here.
>
> The truth is that I haven't any idea of what to or I can do, so I am
> asking around.
> One of my ideas was something to create something who can:
> 1) record sounds in real time
> 2) automatically store this files so I easily use them just by drag and drop
> 3) put these files in a sequencer or loop them
VST on Linux is probably not the best method to use, mostly because
there are barely any hosts for native VST plugins (because of licensing
issues). JACK may be a good idea.
--ll
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 07 2007 - 20:15:03 EEST