Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4 Sep 2007, at 11:23, Tim Blechmann wrote:

> hi all,
>
> i'm not really familiar with the ladspa development process, but is
> there any quality assurance for ladspa plugins?
>
> i have been implementing some of my filters as ladspa plugins, but
> when
> trying to compare them with others, i found, that some of the plugins
> did not do, what i expected them to do (a white noise generator did
> not
> generate white noise, a shelf filter was highly unstable when changing
> parameters) ...
>
> of course, all plugins are free (as in speech), without any warranty,
> but i still think, that there should be a certain amount of quality
> assurance, if we want people to use the ladspa plugins ...
>
> have there been some thoughts of introducing some kind of ladspa qa?

Not that I know of, but it's a brilliant idea.

I've been meaning to setup some kind of wiki based thing where users
can share problems/experiences, but just never had the time.

- - Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFG3TMC/0TGT3036WYRAizZAKCfCkPLWLb9L1nF002pYhNvEsFm2wCePAO/
E3lvSn+SeBO62ZsWTNrSd9M=
=FF2P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Sep 4 16:15:03 2007