Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)

From: Forest Bond <forest@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Sep 05 2007 - 19:57:07 EEST

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:18:51AM -0400, Phil Frost wrote:
> Does anyone actually use packaged versions of LADSPA plugins? Every time
> I've tried to do so, the old versions available in packages would not
> compile on my platform, or had fatal stability issues, or were not
> available, or were missing components.

Which distro?

Why would you be compiling a package? Shouldn't it just install?

-Forest

-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev

application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature

Received on Wed Sep 5 20:15:04 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Blechmann: "Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)"
Previous message: N. Gey: "[LAD] LADSPA Windows OR Effects on all three major systems."
In reply to: Phil Frost: "Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)"
Next in thread: Tim Blechmann: "Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 05 2007 - 20:15:04 EEST