Re: [LAD] LV2 realtime safe memory pool extension

David Olofson <david@email-addr-hidden> writes:

>> Also most lock free algorithms are patented so this can be point of
>> host supporting only one feature set.
>
> You shouldn't need any lock-free constructs, unless I'm missing
> something... Is it a requirement that real time safe allocations can
> be done in other threads than the real time audio thread?

You dont missin anything. I think you are right about lock-free
algorithms in rt-safe memory manager. I said a non-sense.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev