Re: [LAD] [Jackit-devel] [PATCH] jack dbus and logs improvement

Krzysztof Foltman <wdev@email-addr-hidden> writes:

> Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>
>> I'd like to hear what other ppl think about this. It works for me both
>> ways. If most ppl like to have two modes merged in one executable just
>> to see jackd is running not jackdbus, so be it, I'll merge those changes
>> into dbus patch.
>
> I'm definitely in favour of the merge. The previous solution (old jackd,
> new jackdbus) was definitely confusing to me. While I understand the
> distinction now, it wasn't obvious at first.

So having jackd behave in orthagonal way is not confusing? Like, jackd
process is running, why my apps cannot connect?!?!?

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev