Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

Ok: my next question is, given that a software has native
alsa support, Jack support, do we need to put some effort into
adding 1) pulse audio support and 2) OSS support?
Is that a good idea or is it just a waste of time?

Victor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Vaughan" <jayv@email-addr-hidden>
To: <linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

>>> Does this mean that pulseaudio is preferred to Jack?
>>
>> For desktop and user applications yes, for professional audio no.
>>
>
>
> There should be no distinction. The fact that there is, means that
> the designs are broken. Audio should just plain work - period.
>
> ;
> --
> Jay Vaughan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jan 21 04:15:01 2008