On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 23:23 +0000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> Possibly the most important thing that we can draw from this is that the
> LV2 docs are not complete enough for a busy closed source developer to see
> the viability of the format. Everything he mentioned was shot down in
> flames so it's not a case of the format being well thought out as he
> explicitly stated.
This is true, a FAQ or "why is LV2 different/better" document would
probably help. For people used to things like VST it can take a bit of
thinking for the LV2 idea to 'click'.
-DR-
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jan 23 04:15:28 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 23 2008 - 04:15:29 EET