On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 20:42 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 19:05:49 schrieb Thorsten Wilms:
> > I don't quite see what would stop a company from bundling LS with
> > commercial content, stating that LS is included as a freebie.
>
> It's simple: as soon as it's bundled with commercial content, say on a medium
> they want money for, LS would be part of a commercial product, thus exactly
> what the exception prohibits.
It's simple: That is why LS is neither Open Source or Free Software *
Claiming otherwise is intentionally misleading deception.
Complaining about it (again...) is just a stupid waste of time.
We know all of this already. Move on, list, move on. ;)
-DR-
(* Some reasonable people care, some reasonable people don't, BFD)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jan 26 00:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 26 2008 - 00:15:02 EET