On Jan 27, 2008 5:50 AM, porl sheean <porl42@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 27/01/2008, Mlf Conv <mlf.conv@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So LinuxSampler is basically a pure GPLed computer program.
> >
> > Marek
> >
> >
> > i'm not trying to add fuel to the fire or anything, but if this is the
> case, and the gpl protects against the sort of thing they are worried about
> anyway, why go through all the hassle of adding the clause that has
> obviously (whether deserved or not) caused so much controversy? wouldn't it
> be better to simply have a faq item stating that the gpl prohibits this
> behaviour anyway?
>
> i hope this comes across right without upsetting anyone, as it is
> obviously a delicate topic, and i am just trying to understand it better
> myself, not cause more issues :)
>
> porl
>
Yes, that's what i was suggesting, when i talked to Christian last time. Or
making an amendment to GPL which is fully GPL compatible if it feels to
vague.
Marek
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Jan 27 16:15:28 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 27 2008 - 16:15:28 EET