Re: [LAD] [OT] LinuxSampler and GPL - some clarifications

From: Marek <mlf.conv@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jan 28 2008 - 00:49:48 EET

On Jan 27, 2008 10:56 PM, Forest Bond <forest@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:23:21PM +0100, Marek wrote:
> > On Jan 27, 2008 9:40 PM, Forest Bond <forest@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:14:29PM +0100, Marek wrote:
> >>> If so then this is FUD for you indeed. If you are a copyright holder then
> >>> you should know how the GPL protects your work.
>
> >> Agreed. But your interpretation of the GPL is one that I've certainly never
> >> seen.
>
> > You have seen it now :)
>
> Well, your interpretation differs greatly from that of the FSF (as well as the
> vast majority of the GPL camp). I wish you luck evangelizing it.

Define vast majority of the GPL camp. Give me the facts, give me the links.

Marek
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jan 28 04:15:04 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 28 2008 - 04:15:04 EET