Re: [LAD] [OT] LinuxSampler and GPL - some clarifications

On Sunday 27 January 2008, Marek wrote:
>On Jan 27, 2008 10:56 PM, Forest Bond <forest@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:23:21PM +0100, Marek wrote:
>> > On Jan 27, 2008 9:40 PM, Forest Bond <forest@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:14:29PM +0100, Marek wrote:
>> >>> If so then this is FUD for you indeed. If you are a copyright holder
>> >>> then you should know how the GPL protects your work.
>> >>
>> >> Agreed. But your interpretation of the GPL is one that I've certainly
>> >> never seen.
>> >
>> > You have seen it now :)
>>
>> Well, your interpretation differs greatly from that of the FSF (as well as
>> the vast majority of the GPL camp). I wish you luck evangelizing it.
>
>Define vast majority of the GPL camp. Give me the facts, give me the links.
>
>Marek

Tell ya what, Marek. Take your proposal to the FSF. Don't take the word of
people who have actually read the GPL's words for it, so get it from the
horses mouth so to speak. You obviously aren't about to believe any of us
anyway so quit harassing these good folks over it.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Consultants are mystical people who ask a company for a number and then
give it back to them.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev