Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 10:42 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 06:25:31 schrieben Sie:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > So get it: there is NOT only one definition of the term "open source"
> > > when standing alone. Like with many unspecific short terms, different
> > > people have different opinions of those short terms.
> >
> > Yours just coincidentally is shared by virtually nobody and it just so
> > happens that this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your software
> > which you wish to call 'open source' for PR reasons.
>
> Right, just by the majority of e.g. all Windows and OS X users, hmm who
> reflect the majority of all users anyway. And right, I forgot I'm promoting a
> product. Thanks Dave for enlighten us about the truth! Now I clearly see
> there is only white and nothing else than white! Well, maybe black, but the
> black ones are evil by definition and don't count.

Then why not call it MS or AS and be done with it?

-- 
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev