Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

From: pete shorthose <zenadsl6252@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 29 2008 - 16:00:53 EET

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian
> Schoenebeck wrote:
> > So get it: there is NOT only one definition
> > of the term "open source" when standing
> > alone. Like with many unspecific short terms,
> > different people have different opinions of
> > those short terms.
>
> Yours just coincidentally is shared by
> virtually nobody

did you just presume to speak for virtually
everybody?

> and it just so happens that
> this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your
> software which you wish to call 'open source'
> for PR reasons.

virtually nobody cares what you think.
how's that?

cheers,
pete.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jan 29 16:15:09 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 29 2008 - 16:15:09 EET