Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:55 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:18:00 -0500
> > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:39 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
> > > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +0000, pete
> > > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
> > > > > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +0000, pete
> > > > > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
> > > > > > > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > now, if you feel the need, concoct some juicy
> > > > combination of pejoratives and craft them into
> > > > a rejoinder. it's a free shot at the basket
> > > > because i'm well and truly done talking to you.
> > > > i might as well be debating an ATM.
> > >
> > > No, that's quite alright. You began the attacks, you may finish them.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how you can possibly justify the ridiculous argument above
> > > given the nature of how this sub-thread began (i.e. you attacking me).
> >
> > bull. you used the ad populum logical fallacy to defend your favoured interpretation
> > of a contentious term. i used that same logical fallacy against you because
> > it was false. obviously, as a natural consequence of refuting me, you would refute
> > your earlier argument.
>
> Um. When the point being made is literally that most people think X, ad
> populum is obviously not a fallacy.

unfortunately for me, you are quite right. but only about that.
now, as i stand by everything else i said, and as you neither dealt with it
nor conceded anything, we don't actually seem to be arguing about anything
at all any more.
looks like we are both done.

cheers,
pete.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Jan 31 00:15:05 2008