Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

From: Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Jan 31 2008 - 02:14:05 EET

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 18:52 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:55 -0500
> Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > Um. When the point being made is literally that most people think X, ad
> > populum is obviously not a fallacy.
>
> unfortunately for me, you are quite right. but only about that.
> now, as i stand by everything else i said, and as you neither dealt with it
> nor conceded anything, we don't actually seem to be arguing about anything
> at all any more.

.... were we ever?

> looks like we are both done.

I hope so.

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Jan 31 04:15:14 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 04:15:14 EET