Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:32 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Bob Ham:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > > Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > > > I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g. OSC via UDP or TCP.
> > > The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long as it
> > > serves to free LASH from being a libjack client
> > Why is freeing LASH from being a libjack client a goal?
>
> If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the jack-settings
> per session.

This was addressed elsewhere. The issue is the dynamicity of JACK.
Rewriting LASH to use D-Bus because you don't want to fix JACK is
lunacy.

Bob

-- 
Bob Ham <rah@email-addr-hidden>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev