Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:32 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Bob Ham:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > > Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > > > I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g. OSC via UDP or TCP.
> > > The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long as it
> > > serves to free LASH from being a libjack client
> > Why is freeing LASH from being a libjack client a goal?

> as more and more users have not only one session per computer but both
> multiple sessions per computer and multiple computers per session, that is
> another reason to part lash from jack-as-a-dependency

Why is LASH being a JACK client a problem if there are multiple
sessions? Similarly, why is LASH being a JACK client a problem if there
are multiple hosts?

Bob

-- 
Bob Ham <rah@email-addr-hidden>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev