Re: [LAD] optimum binary distribution (was: vectorization)

From: Richard Spindler <richard.spindler@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Apr 17 2008 - 11:49:58 EEST

2008/4/17, Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden>:
> > What do you think about the approach taken by "liboil"?
> > http://liboil.freedesktop.org/
> >
> > The library has implementations for various CPU-Extensions, and at run
> > time, when the library is initialized, a set of function pointers is
> > set to point to the "right" implementation functions.
>
>
> It would have been smarter to have liboil.so be a symlink to
> liboil-sse_4_1.so (or whatever hardware you may have)

What if I export /usr over NFS and have machines with different
x86-processors using that filesystem?

Having a completely "self-contained" solution sure has its merits.

Cheers
-Richard

-- 
Don't contribute to the Y10K problem!
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Apr 17 12:15:05 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 17 2008 - 12:15:05 EEST