Re: [LAD] optimum binary distribution (was: vectorization)

On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 10:49 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote:
> 2008/4/17, Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden>:>
> > It would have been smarter to have liboil.so be a symlink to
> > liboil-sse_4_1.so (or whatever hardware you may have)
>
> What if I export /usr over NFS and have machines with different
> x86-processors using that filesystem?
>
You really do that? OK, the solution is identical to choosing the right
base architecture in the first place. One of these gets mounted
as /usr/lib

/*/usr/lib/alpha
/*/usr/lib/mips
/*/usr/lib/ppc
/*/usr/lib/sparc
/*/usr/lib/i386
/*/usr/lib/i686
/*/usr/lib/i686.sse2
...

> Having a completely "self-contained" solution sure has its merits.
>
> Cheers
> -Richard
>

-- 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev