Re: [LAD] FW: [piksel] The future of videojack ?

"Stephen Sinclair" <radarsat1@email-addr-hidden> writes:

> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Juuso Alasuutari
> <juuso.alasuutari@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> The audio callback API wouldn't need to be changed in any way. Video
>> streaming capabilities would require adding a smallish additional API.
>
> I hope it's not too presumptuous, since I know nothing about JACK, but
> if going to the trouble of adding video support, why not make it more
> general and allow transport of _any_ data with audio-sample accuracy?
> I can think of a couple of useful reasons for it...
>
> (embedding OSC packets, audio-synchronized haptics, etc..)

OSC is not periodic, audio and video is. So if we add OSC (and/or
generic event ports), IMHO it would be closer to current MIDI port
semantics.

-- 
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev