Re: [LAD] FW: [piksel] The future of videojack ?

From: Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 00:49:01 EEST

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Juuso Alasuutari
<juuso.alasuutari@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> The audio callback API wouldn't need to be changed in any way. Video
> streaming capabilities would require adding a smallish additional API.

I hope it's not too presumptuous, since I know nothing about JACK, but
if going to the trouble of adding video support, why not make it more
general and allow transport of _any_ data with audio-sample accuracy?
I can think of a couple of useful reasons for it...

(embedding OSC packets, audio-synchronized haptics, etc..)

Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed May 7 04:15:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 07 2008 - 04:15:01 EEST