Re: [LAD] FW: [piksel] The future of videojack ?

From: Juuso Alasuutari <juuso.alasuutari@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 00:52:13 EEST

Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Juuso Alasuutari
> <juuso.alasuutari@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> The audio callback API wouldn't need to be changed in any way. Video
>> streaming capabilities would require adding a smallish additional API.
>
> I hope it's not too presumptuous, since I know nothing about JACK, but
> if going to the trouble of adding video support, why not make it more
> general and allow transport of _any_ data with audio-sample accuracy?
> I can think of a couple of useful reasons for it...
>
> (embedding OSC packets, audio-synchronized haptics, etc..)

Yes, I suppose the suggestion I posted could be about streaming
arbitrary blobs of data. But I'd like to hear from someone who can
actually tell if the idea is viable, I was mainly following my intuition.

Juuso
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed May 7 04:15:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 07 2008 - 04:15:01 EEST