Re: [LAD] starting out with tux audio

From: Frank Barknecht <fbar@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jun 18 2008 - 10:34:57 EEST

Hallo,
AlgoMantra hat gesagt: // AlgoMantra wrote:

> >
> > I didn't mean to recommend Pd as a general language (this time), but
> > as a kind of library that takes away many tedious tasks like GUI
> > writing or audio interfacing and lets you concentrate on the dsp side
> > in your C code, while still being able to quickly run it. Of course
> > you could also use LADSPA for this.
>
>
> Thanks..I see what you're suggesting now. I have mixed up platforms
> like Python-OSC-ChucK etc, and I do see people using different combos
> all the time. Somehow it does seem messy from a aesthetic point
> of view, as in, things would appear more neatly organised if the platform
> were singular....innit?

Well, with Pd, it *is* singular: You only run one application, Pd,
that you can extend with additional objectclasses written in C - or in
Pd itself, Lua, Python, Scheme, Java, Forth, Haskell, Q, Faust and
maybe some other languages I don't yet know of.

Ciao

-- 
 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jun 18 16:15:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 18 2008 - 16:15:02 EEST