if there was an open standard for this sort of thing that we could
implement in software and interface directly with jack etc then it
would make my idea redundant.... i would love to see such a thing
though :)
what does netjack (or netjackmp) lack compared to these
implementations? i'm still not entirely sure of netjack's
synchronising abilities for instance.
porl
2008/8/1 Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>:
>
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 10:10 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 10:27:29AM +1200, Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
>>
>> > Check these out:
>> > http://www.cobranet.info - has a silicon implementation
>> > http://www.axiaaudio.com/livewire/default.htm
>> > http://www.ethersound.com/
>> > http://www.audinate.com/
>>
>> Since you seem to be into this sort of thing: can cobranet
>> be implemented in software, using standard network interfaces
>> (assuming you have a realtime kernel, and the interfaces are
>> dedicated to this task) ?
>
> It can. Harrison does this on their consoles/routers. Its not trivial to
> make it work right, but it can certainly be done and the channel count
> is high.
>
> --p
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Aug 1 20:15:03 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 01 2008 - 20:15:04 EEST