On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 01:02:07AM +1000, porl sheean wrote:
> if there was an open standard for this sort of thing that we could
> implement in software and interface directly with jack etc then it
> would make my idea redundant.... i would love to see such a thing
> though :)
I'm working on such a thing, or at least a variation of it.
> what does netjack (or netjackmp) lack compared to these
> implementations? i'm still not entirely sure of netjack's
> synchronising abilities for instance.
Netjack AFAIK is point-to-point, while cobranet is more of
an 'audio bus' where all nodes can talk to each other in
any combination as long as their is enough capacity.
It has a controller node where you request bandwidth, and
which provides timing information for the data you want to
send, relative to the periodic sync packet is sends itself.
Everything is planned to avoid collisions on the network.
Links can be broadcast or point to point.
Ciao,
-- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Aug 2 00:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 02 2008 - 00:15:02 EEST