On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:23:20PM +0400, alex stone wrote:
> Will we continue to have a Jack version minus the dbus infrastructure,
> once jack2 is released?
As an uninvolved observer I am wondering why the dbus control interface,
if it is indeed only one of many potential interfaces using the c/c++
API, is not packaged separately as an optional add-on. If it is indeed a
compile time option, the design is flawed IMHO. Generally, the new
control API sounds like a good idea but why can't the new features be
exposed as new command line tools without dbus dependency per default?
So you want the dbus interface? Fine, just install jack-control-dbus or
whatever.
Or am I not getting it?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon May 18 16:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 18 2009 - 16:15:02 EEST