Re: [LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:53:27PM +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:

> [Fons Adriaensen]
> >
> >This makes is backwards compatible, as no new field is required
> >in the descriptor struct.
>
> AFAICS, binary compatibility is not compromised by an expanded
> descriptor struct, as long as additional members are appended to the
> struct.

This is not strictly true. Indexing an array of such structs
will fail if the code doing it is generated by a compiler that
didn't use the exact size.

But that will indeed not to happen, as hosts are assumed to use
ladspa_descriptor() provided by the plugin.
 
Ciao,

-- 
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev