Re: [LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 23:23 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:

> Sorry, didn't see that. Well, I guess there's no problem on the plugin
> side then... any other possible problems on the host side?
>
> In case there are none, we could add an array or another callback.

You'd need a way to let the host know if the plugin is version 1.1 or
1.2. Otherwise the host might try to use the new fields which might be
garbage.

I can't see a way of getting a LADSPA version number from a plugin at
present. Maybe a ladspa_version() function could be added (outside
LADSPA_Descriptor!), defaulting to 1.1.

But I'd probably just go for the ladspa_get_port_value_enums() function
and leave LADSPA_Descriptor untouched, just to be safe.

Damon

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 19 04:15:03 2009