Re: [LAD] [RFC] LADSPA 1.2

2009/6/18 Damon Chaplin <damon@email-addr-hidden>

>
> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 23:23 +0200, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> > Sorry, didn't see that. Well, I guess there's no problem on the plugin
> > side then... any other possible problems on the host side?
> >
> > In case there are none, we could add an array or another callback.
>
> You'd need a way to let the host know if the plugin is version 1.1 or
> 1.2. Otherwise the host might try to use the new fields which might be
> garbage.
>
> I can't see a way of getting a LADSPA version number from a plugin at
> present. Maybe a ladspa_version() function could be added (outside
> LADSPA_Descriptor!), defaulting to 1.1.
>
> But I'd probably just go for the ladspa_get_port_value_enums() function
> and leave LADSPA_Descriptor untouched, just to be safe

You're right. Well, I vote for the extra function and leaving descriptor
untouched too.

Stefano

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 19 04:15:03 2009