On Sunday 02 August 2009 17:28:01 keller wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> > keller wrote:
> >> On Aug 2, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Raymond Martin wrote:
> >>> I am referring to the Launch4J scripts to build an executable and
> >>> others.
> >>> For example, you have an .exe for windows, isn't Launch4J what was
> >>> used?
> >>> If so, there is a script for it, as indicated in the build.xml.
> >>
> >> As stated before, launch4j is a commercial product that I was using
> >> on
> >> a trial version. There is no way that I can provide that. I was
> >> considering buying it if worked well, but even then, I cannot provide
> >> it.
> >>
> >> All it does is wrap the .jar file and other dirs to make it
> >> convenient
> >> for the users to install and launch. So I guess you're saying it's
> >> not
> >> allowed?
> >
> > as stated in another mail, this is hogwash. you are perfectly entitled
> > to chose whatever build tool you want, without having to redistribute
> > it. just be careful that all the third-party software you include has
> > the original build files included.
>
> As I am hearing now then, I can use install4j as long as I provide the
> install4j script (but not install4j itself) in the source repository.
>
> Is that correct?
>
Yes.
Raymond
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Aug 3 04:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 03 2009 - 04:15:03 EEST