Re: [LAD] Kim did the switch to Linux

On 08/06/2009 05:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> hermann wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Yes, I don't understand why people mean linux audio is a mess, last
>> day's I have setup a new box with debian/sid and it took me a half day
>> to get a full featured rt audio/midi environment on the run. It's like
>> always in life, if you wont to use a tool, you must know how it work's.
>> There is no diff in this case to windos or mac. Only, when you have
>> already learn how one tool works, may you don't wont to learn how a
>> other tool work to receive the same results. So the price for the switch
>> to linux is a small piece of your brain witch you must open for basic
>> linux knowledge. :-)
>>
>> hermann
>>
>
> With knowledge you need half a day, for Windows people without knowledge
> need half an hour ;). But comparisons like this are useless. The
> conclusion that people started with Windows and don't know Linux isn't
> true for the scene were I'm from. We started with the C64 etc. and then
> we used Linux only and because of troubles with real-time audio some
> switched to Windows. As an audio engineer on work I had to work with
> Microsoft and Apple and less trouble, at home I'm using Linux with lot
> of troubles.
>
>

Again. What is your point? Many people use Linux Audio tools and
infrastructure for professional use everyday.

All you are saying is that Linux is difficult for you and your friends
to use and Microsoft is easy.

Why do you insist on continually saying this to the LAD list? We know
that there are limitations to the Linux Audio system. No one has ever
claimed otherwise.

Because you very rarely have useful feedback, as far as I can tell, you
are a troll.

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 6 16:15:08 2009