Raymond Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:59:39 Chris Cannam wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, drew Roberts<zotz@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 06 August 2009 03:51:30 you wrote:
>>>
>>>> The second question becomes broadly irrelevant here if we are
>>>> prepared to accept Bob did convey his intention that the Impro-Visor
>>>> code be GPL'd, but Arnout and I were responding to the blanket "use of
>>>> GPL code makes it GPL" (which would imply the second question above).
>>>>
>>> And this I certainly agree with. Use of GPL code does not automatically
>>> make another program GPL. It just gives the author of that code a legal
>>> headache if the new program is not GPL.
>>>
>> Yes, exactly.
>>
>
> Pure BS. People who cannot read the GPL properly.
>
> Raymond
Seems to depend of the interpretation what "usage" does mean. I will
indicate to the issue about LADSPA used by Non-GPL software. Use of GPL
code included to another program makes this other program automatically
GPL'd. I guess this is one of the subjects that is easy to understand
for people that aren't lawyers and even with broken English.
I'm off-line now.
Bye,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 6 20:15:10 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 06 2009 - 20:15:10 EEST