Re: [LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
>> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide
>> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
>> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
>> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
>> result of your efforts?
>>
>
> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this point
> at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is the
> original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new text
> documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of the
> projects.)
>
>

So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?

IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.

It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.

It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually
doing anything specific?

Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd

> all the best,
>
> drew
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 9 00:15:05 2009