Re: [LAD] Impro-Visor created on sourceforge

On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:49:08 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> On 08/09/2009 05:44 AM, drew Roberts wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote:
> >> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide
> >> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
> >> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
> >> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
> >> result of your efforts?
> >
> > Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
> > point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is
> > the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with
> > new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking
> > either of the projects.)
>
> So this is a pre fork or a split or a bend but not an outright fork?
>
> IMO, it's so close to a fork as to be almost negligible.
>
> It's all the ground work in place but none of the follow through.
>
> It's like a "psyche" intended to frighten the recipient without actually
> doing anything specific?
>

Yeah, the ground shakes and you get all frightened, but not much happens,
yet!

The Impro-Visor code is out and on SF, so it worked, didn't it.

Raymond

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 9 00:15:07 2009