Hello Ken!
I can contribute little, but it may still push you in one direction.
I've seen both some QT-code and understood it and I've seen some gtk+, which
I had more problems understanding. So I think QT might be easier to implement.
Also QT has a lot by itself, nice helpers.
GTK now may be as easy to write, just me not understanding it, I'm not too
bright at it though. But GTK is good to use for blind people, because of the
Gnome people pushing some accessibiloity stuff. Also gtk and the glib have to
offer many things, which might come in handy.
One last remark and I drop off; GTK+ might not be that easy to read for me,
because GTK is originally in C and gtk+ - as I understand - was kind of a
complex wrapper for it.
Kindest regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Aug 14 00:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 14 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST