On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 21:25 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
> Hello Ken!
> I can contribute little, but it may still push you in one direction.
> I've seen both some QT-code and understood it and I've seen some gtk+, which
> I had more problems understanding. So I think QT might be easier to implement.
> Also QT has a lot by itself, nice helpers.
> GTK now may be as easy to write, just me not understanding it, I'm not too
> bright at it though. But GTK is good to use for blind people, because of the
> Gnome people pushing some accessibiloity stuff. Also gtk and the glib have to
> offer many things, which might come in handy.
> One last remark and I drop off; GTK+ might not be that easy to read for me,
> because GTK is originally in C and gtk+ - as I understand - was kind of a
> complex wrapper for it.
> Kindest regards
> Julien
Gtkmm is quite nice for the more C++ minded. Much nicer standard C++
style than the cracked out preprocessed pseudo-C++ insanity that is Qt,
at any rate.
The documentation is pretty crap in some places though.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Aug 14 00:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 14 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST