On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> For video studios I guess SMPTE is the better choice. When I was working
> with SMPTE I never had any trouble because of sync, it was accurate enough.
>
> It would be clever to use JACK transport internal Linux machines, but to
> have the option to sync any equipment by SMPTE.
I could imagine a 'bridge' between SMPTE and Jack: you could have a Jack
timebase client broadcasting an SMPTE track, or a Jack timebase master
listening to an SMPTE track and keeping the Jack applications in sync with
it.
jackctlmmc.sf.net seems to do something similar for some MIDI timing.
Beware I might be talking rubbish here though, I've never actually used
SMPTE nor MMC :)
Arnout
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Sep 21 20:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 21 2009 - 20:15:03 EEST