Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Christian wrote:
>> For the keys I love aftertouch :)
>>
>
> An option that can regulate the number of the aftertouch events that are
> send is useful. Some sequencers have an option to reduce the amount of
> recorded aftertouch events, but not every sequencer is able to do it.
> Using aftertouch sometimes produce too many unneeded data, that can
> become a problem.
>
talking about aftertouch (aka key-pressure), there's two different
kinds: "channel aftertouch" (independent of key/pitch) and "polyphonic
aftertouch" (per key/pitch). the later is seldom implemented but it
might give an edge on this "open-source midi keyboard" project. it also
generates a greater amount of events as Ralf warns about
cheers
-- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@email-addr-hidden _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Sep 26 16:15:10 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 26 2009 - 16:15:10 EEST