Re: [LAD] Non-daw, non-sequencer (fork?)

michael noble wrote:
> I had contact with the author in May through the mail-list for these
> apps. Beyond that, I couldn't say.
I've mailed him, the mailinglist... no sign of life. :(

I've joined the #non channel, no sign of life from the author :(

Maybe it's time to consider a fork (not by myself, I'm not a programmer)...

\r

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Grammostola Rosea
> <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden <mailto:rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm impressed by my recent discovery: non-daw and especially
> non-sequencer:
>
> http://non.tuxfamily.org/
>
> I love the design of the sequencer, it's very intuitive, userfriendly
> and fast! Respect for that!
>
> But I couldn't contact the author. So I was wondering, maybe he is on
> this (lad) list?
> I really like to know what his plans are with the apps and if he needs
> support in some kind of way. Does he continue to work on it? (If not
> that would be a real pity, cause this is not just another sequencer...
> And then we might need some talented devs to fork it...)
>
> Ok, I hope I will get some sign of life from the author soon...
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> \rooz
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Sep 29 16:15:01 2009