Re: [LAD] Non-daw, non-sequencer (fork?)

From: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Sep 30 2009 - 11:30:30 EEST

Danni Coy wrote:
> I have taken a look at non daw - and I have to say that I am sold on
> the concept (particularly using jack/lash/midi infrastructure wherever
> possible)
> there are a few extra features I would like to see added. But am
> incredibly busy at the moment.
Danni,

That would be cool! I posted this cause it will be a lost for Linux
Audio if this dies imho.

Btw I think I found one disadvantage in the workflow of non-sequencer.
You can choose a scale to work in, but the disadvantage afaik is that
you can't choose notes outsides that scale. Maybe I'm wrong, but if I'm
right it seems to narrow the possibilities quite a bit.

\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Sep 30 12:15:10 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 30 2009 - 12:15:10 EEST