Re: [LAD] Non-daw, non-sequencer (fork?)

From: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:15:50 EEST

Danni Coy wrote:
> I am kind of work till after midnight every day in my day job busy at
> the moment. I would like to get back into open source development when
> I have a bit of breathing room.
>
> I like the modular approach taken by non daw... I would like to see
> the pro audio infrastructure in linux get to the point where it can
> support an application like this really well. I have in mind perhaps a
> few small improvements and I would like to see it be able to use the
> new LADI infrastructure...
>
> I took a quick peak at the sequencer (sequencers are not normally part
> of my workflow - or rather I haven't found one that really suits me yet).
>
> With regards to not being able to put in out of scale notes it seems
> you can get around that by choosing a chromatic scale type.
Ah I was thinking about such a solution, but it's already there, cool.

\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Oct 1 16:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 01 2009 - 16:15:01 EEST