Re: [LAD] Non-daw, non-sequencer (fork?)

From: rosea grammostola <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 12:35:11 EEST

rosea grammostola wrote:
> Danni Coy wrote:
>> I am kind of work till after midnight every day in my day job busy at
>> the moment. I would like to get back into open source development
>> when I have a bit of breathing room.
>>
>> I like the modular approach taken by non daw... I would like to see
>> the pro audio infrastructure in linux get to the point where it can
>> support an application like this really well. I have in mind perhaps
>> a few small improvements and I would like to see it be able to use
>> the new LADI infrastructure...
>>
>> I took a quick peak at the sequencer (sequencers are not normally
>> part of my workflow - or rather I haven't found one that really suits
>> me yet).
>>
>> With regards to not being able to put in out of scale notes it seems
>> you can get around that by choosing a chromatic scale type.
> Ah I was thinking about such a solution, but it's already there, cool.
>
>
> \r
>
and in View use can choose for 'compacted', which makes the notes
outside the scale visible/invisible.

Non-daw doesn't work here with recent jack1 and jack2

\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Oct 1 16:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 01 2009 - 16:15:01 EEST