Re: [LAD] BFS and lennart's realtimekit idea...

From: Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 22 2009 - 19:26:52 EEST

J?rn Nettingsmeier:
>
> this looks like it could provide a simple way of granting fixed-deadline
> tasks appropriate cpu time without effectively handing the machine over.
> i was quite skeptical of lennart's idea of a userspace daemon to do the
> job reliably, but the scheduler should have pretty good leverage on
> rogue tasks :)
>

Why do you need a special scheduling mode? If you run a watchdog in the
background, you shouldn't handle the machine over.

*****
plug!
*****

"das_watchdog" should be a properly made watchdog. It has saved
me numerous times, and works gently by temporarily turning off
realtime priority for all processes if something happens.
http://archive.notam02.no/arkiv/src/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Oct 22 20:15:05 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 22 2009 - 20:15:06 EEST