On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 19:19 +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com> writes:
> >> Because it passes a GTK window, doesn't it? (Doesn't it?) Which has
> >> no meaning anywhere except GTK.
> >
> > It passes GTK *widget*.
>
> Right, OK, same thing though from this point of view. GTK anything.
How can one possible embed a Gtk widget without... having a Gtk
widget? :)
Again, to be sure this is clear, there is no "Gtk UI extension". The UI
extension can return a UI of any type (as a void pointer), Gtk just
happens to be one of them. Qt or Fltk could be another, or some kind of
higher level wrapper thingamawhatsit that would be necessary to support
this - anything at all.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Nov 9 00:15:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 09 2009 - 00:15:06 EET