Re: [LAD] FOSS Ethernet Soundcard

From: Florian Faber <faber@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Nov 24 2009 - 17:53:01 EET

Karl Hammar wrote:

>> [RockNet, Roland Digital Snake, Ethersound]
>>> That tells us that it should be doable. But of cause we want an open
>>> protocol. Do you know the capacity limits of those systems?
>> Approximately what you could expect from a 100MBit/s link. At least 32
>> channels, rocknet even more, but they use 400MBit/s.
> Yes, but the devil is in the details as always. Having a working
> example is as usual an working example. And we are missing an open
> protocol for this.

What is wrong with netjack? It's made for point-to-point and very
simple. You just have to solve the clock issue unless you want to lose
bit transparency.

Flo

-- 
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Nov 24 20:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 24 2009 - 20:15:03 EET