Re: [LAD] some questions about writing a jack client

From: Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Nov 25 2009 - 19:10:59 EET

"Gabriel M. Beddingfield":
> So you see, by using a mutex... you have to consider
> those sections of code as being a part of your
> process() function.

Great explanation, but you forgot to explicitly mention
that those sections of code also has to run with higher
or equal priority as the jack process to avoid priority
inversion.

Arnold Krille:
> Locks and waits are not realtime save.

Not always true. But usually: yes. :-)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Nov 25 20:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 25 2009 - 20:15:05 EET