On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:05:51 -0500
drew Roberts <zotz@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 13:31:24 Karl Hammar wrote:
> > > --------------------------
> > > Firmware/Software
> > > --------------------------
> > > The device will run Linux OS.
> > > Audio data transfer will be via netjack using CELT compression.
> >
> > Ack.
>
> Can CELT also do uncompressed or lossless? Otherwise limiting to CELT might
> not be such a good idea if I have followed things closely enough.
>
> all the best,
>
> drew
I hadn't spotted that :(
You're right, lossy compression would be a disaster for this project.
Even lossless compression is only an advantage if it can be done in
small enough chunks to not actually increase latency rather than
reduce it.
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Wed Dec 2 20:15:05 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 02 2009 - 20:15:05 EET